 |
 |
||
 |
|
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||||||||
 |
The Planetary Society BlogBy Emily Lakdawalla
Sep. 2, 2010 | 14:01 PDT | 21:01 UTC Special report by Bill Nye from the VEXAG Meeting
Is Venus the forgotten planet, or just one that's hard to figure out? Absorbing the presentations at the Venus EXploration Advisory Group (VEXAG) meeting in Madison, Wisconsin in the U.S. this week, I can tell you Venus is both. Many people around our world of space explorers seldom think about Venus. This is evidenced by the relatively small number of missions that have made the trip to the hot acid planet, and by the exiguity of basic facts about what goes on there. With Mars, it's a different story. When our robots arrive at the red planet, there's plenty to see and plenty of data to send back to us on Earth. Such is not the way with Venus, but perhaps it should be. Each presenter I spoke with was excited to be exploring Venus but generally suffering a little frustration. Imagine us, a spacefaring species that loves to wander and transmit images, relishing pictures of exotic lakes of ethane on a moon of distant Saturn, but not knowing if a planet much closer by, that shines romantic beams every evening brighter than any star, has volcanoes erupting on its surface. Venus is a hard target -- solid rock but a very difficult place to explore. Its clouds of sulfur compounds obscure a rocky surface so hot that the acid rain evaporates before it can get to the ground.
Whether the researchers were arguing about the isotopic evidence for and against volcanism, or whether they were brainstorming ways to get balloon gondolas to survive a whirlwind trip in the relatively warm though low-pH super-rotation of acidic winds aloft, they all share a concern about Earth on account of their fascination with Venus. The subtext of all the Venus talk is climate change on Earth.
Almost every paper presented carries with it concern about climate change back here on Earth. Using data gathered by Soviet spacecraft over 20 years ago, researchers are looking for evidence of lightning. Japanese scientists and spacecraft builders have Akatsuki en route to our clouded sister world. Named "Dawn," because that's when Venus is visible, it will fly into a brilliantly conceived orbit that will allow studies of the Venusian air, with light from both the planet's limb and cloud decks. Along with managing the passage of night and day, Akatsuki is in, not a surface-synchronized orbit, but a super-rotating cloud-synched route. And of course, European and North American explorers continually plan missions to know more about this hot old place. Tuesday night Sanjay Limaye, an old friend of the Society and the organizer of the event, arranged for a public talk. Several hundred people came to hear about Venus. Jan Smit from the University of Amsterdam spoke about the geologic boundary created by the Chixculub impact 65 million years ago. He showed that it is indeed the event that wiped out most of the ancient dinosaurs. He logically tied that mass extinction to climate changes on Earth, and then to climate change on Venus. David Grinspoon from the Denver Museum of Nature & Science was next, showing the audience the clear connections and lessons to be learned from the geology of Mars, Earth, and Venus. Climate change was once again his focus. Finally, I got up and did my best to entreat the crowd to take climate change seriously and develop new technologies and save the Earth -- save it for us, for us humans. For me, VEXAG was remarkable. Venus is our closest neighbor, yet we are not clear on what makes that world go round. Everyone at VEXAG would agree, we have to come up many more missions and methods worthy of the challenge above and beneath the clouds of Venus. Bill Nye Sep. 2, 2010 | 12:34 PDT | 19:34 UTC Dawn Journal: Getting warmer, farther from the Sun?Here's our monthly checkup with the Dawn mission, contributed by Marc Rayman, the mission's Project System Engineer. Thanks Marc! --ESL
Dear Papardawnzzi, Dawn's journey ever-deeper into the asteroid belt continues to go well, as the spacecraft carries out its familiar routine of thrusting gently with its ion propulsion system. But the interplanetary traveler has changed some of its habits, performing certain activities a little differently now from what its many followers have been accustomed to. Dawn is now so far from the sun, that even with its tremendous solar arrays, the most powerful ever used on an interplanetary mission, it does not receive enough sunlight to generate sufficient electrical power to operate all systems and still achieve maximum thrust. The largest consumer of power onboard the ship, the ion propulsion system is power hungry. Indeed, the key to its remarkable effectiveness is that, in concert with the solar arrays, it converts the renewable energy from the omnipresent sunlight into thrust with a high-velocity beam of xenon ions, in contrast to conventional propulsion systems, which only work with the more limited energy stored within the chemical propellants. The importance of high power to thrusting has been discussed in detail in several previous logs, including in July 2008[link to the log of July 27, 2008] and September 2009. In preparation for the spacecraft's being as far from the sun as it is now, the mission control team has conducted a great deal of work (including the solar array calibration that was explained in the first of those two logs and performed in November 2008). Now we can see how some of the detailed planning has been put into effect in the operation of the ship. The electrical power generated by a solar cell depends on its temperature. When a cell is warmer, it is a little less efficient at transforming light into electricity, so it yields a little less power, even if the intensity of light impinging on it is unchanged. When Dawn is not thrusting, the onboard power demand is much lower, so less power is drawn from the two huge wings of cells. That means that less of the light captured by the solar arrays is converted to electrical power. So where does the energy of that light go? When the solar panels do not need to generate as much electricity, the excess energy of the absorbed light simply turns to heat, warming the wings. Therefore, the arrays are warmer when Dawn is not thrusting; and when thrusting commences, the arrays need to cool down before they can achieve their best performance. Earlier in the mission, when Dawn was closer to the sun and could produce far more power than it needed (even when the arrays were warm), this small difference was entirely unimportant. Now it is very important. Each week (usually on a Monday), the probe stops thrusting for around eight hours so that instead of pointing an ion thruster in the direction needed to climb out to Vesta, it can aim the main antenna to Earth in order to exchange radio signals with an antenna in NASA's Deep Space Network. At the end of the communication session, the spacecraft returns to the thrust orientation and resumes its powered flight. For the last few months, the solar arrays have been able to meet the onboard demand when they were cool, but when they were warm, the available light was too weak to yield the power required by all systems. There were several solutions to this (some of which probably would have lent themselves to simpler and more jocose descriptions), and the one engineers chose was to initiate thrusting at a somewhat reduced throttle level, demanding less power than at full thrust. That drew enough power from the arrays to bring their temperatures down, allowing them to approach their highest efficiency. Then the sequence running in the main computer commanded the ion propulsion system to throttle up, and the arrays were able to provide the additional power. This strategy has been in use every week since April 19 and has worked flawlessly. As Dawn moved farther from the sun, the power diminished still more. The team knew well in advance that by May, even when the array temperatures were low, there would not be enough power for all systems while at the maximum throttle level. So, beginning May 17, when the spacecraft completes its weekly communication session with its main antenna, it powers off its radio transmitter. Prior to that date, the transmitter had always been left on, even when Dawn was not in contact with Earth. The radio signal had been directed through an auxiliary antenna that broadcasts over a very wide angle in exchange for making the signal much weaker at the receiving antenna on Earth. (This is no different from the control on a flashlight. A narrowly focused beam can easily illuminate a small area, just as Dawn's main antenna allows it to transmit a strong signal toward Earth. For the same power, a wide cone of light from the flashlight provides fainter illumination over a far broader area, but it does not require precise pointing; similarly, Dawn can spread out a weak signal without choosing an orientation specifically designed for communications.) With the transmitter off, Dawn reduced its power needs, thereby ensuring it had enough to allocate to ion thrusting. Each week (usually on a Thursday or Friday), the Deep Space Network listens in to Dawn's radio whisper while the spacecraft is thrusting. Faint though it is, the reception is adequate to confirm that the probe is generally healthy. Although the transmitter has been powered off for thrusting since May, the sequence turns it back on for two hours to permit this verification of the craft's status midway between the main communications sessions on Mondays. The onboard battery was available to help cover the increased power demand for that short time. (So if you were wondering why you haven't been hearing from the spacecraft at other times during the week recently, now you know. Now the probe travels in radio silence except when communication is scheduled.) By July 26, that strategy was no longer sufficient to accommodate the ever-decreasing power. Since then the ion propulsion system has been throttled down during the mid-week health check. Reducing power for the ion thrust allows power to be devoted to the transmitter. Based on extensive analyses performed in 2009, engineers had estimated that Dawn would no longer be able to sustain the highest throttle level by the last week of July 2010, even with the radio off. As it turned out, however, the craft exceeded their expectations and persisted through August 23. Finally, at a distance of 2.02 AU from the sun, it was time to reduce the power to the ion drive. From now on, Dawn will gradually decrease thrust as it travels still farther from the brilliant star. Even at lower throttle levels, however, the ion propulsion system's efficiency is far beyond what is achievable with chemical propulsion. In February we took a detailed look at Dawn's daily change in velocity and recognized that it would continue to increase (thanks to the decrease in the total mass) until throttled operation would be necessary. As predicted then, the space traveler has now reached its peak acceleration of 7.6 meters per second per day (17 miles per hour for a day of thrusting). As this had been accounted for long ago in the design of the trajectory, and motivated some of the tests performed shortly after launch, the future gradual reductions in thrust have already been incorporated into the plan for keeping the ship on a steady course to Vesta and then to Ceres. As the spacecraft continues its ambitious expedition through the asteroid belt, engineers have recently changed another aspect of its operation as well. On August 23, following instructions that had been stored in the main computer the previous week, Dawn powered off all four of its reaction wheels. (It's only coincidental that that is also both the date the ion drive was throttled down to save power and the date there was a power failure in the ice cream shop at the Tribute to Coincidence.) This was the first time since the day it was launched that all the wheels were off. For most of its mission so far, Dawn has used three of these units at a time to help hold its orientation or to turn to a different orientation in the zero-gravity, frictionless environment of spaceflight by electrically changing the speed at which they spin. Wheel no. 4 developed increased friction on June 17, so it was turned off, and wheels 1 - 3 have been in use since then. Mission controllers subsequently elected to turn all the wheels off in order to help preserve them for use at Vesta and Ceres. With the wheels being given a rest, the reaction control system takes over their function. This system fires conventional rocket propellant (perhaps even the same hydrazine formulation you use in your rocket) through small thrusters aimed in different directions to provide the required control of the craft's orientation. Since smoothly accomplishing the transition, Dawn has maintained its usual schedule of devoting 95% of the time to thrusting, gradually changing its orbit so that it will match Vesta's orbit in about 11 months. The occasional brief pulses from the hydrazine thrusters are very effective at keeping the spacecraft stable, but they are too weak to contribute much to reshaping the trajectory around the sun. Even if the entire 45.6-kilogram (101-pound) supply of hydrazine Dawn carried into space had been devoted to changing the probe's velocity, the effect would be less than 0.1 kilometers per second (220 miles per hour), quite insignificant compared to the 4.81 kilometers per second (10,800 miles per hour) the xenon ion thrusting has already achieved (and even that is less than half of what is planned for the entire mission). The ion propulsion system is so much more efficient that it remains the only system capable of propelling the ship to its distant ports, Vesta and then Ceres. Dawn continues to make excellent progress in its voyage to those ancient and unexplored worlds. In the next log, we will consider how far it has come and look ahead to more of what is store for it at the first of these enticing targets. Dawn is 0.19 AU (29 million kilometers or 18 million miles) from Vesta, its next destination. It is also 2.82 AU (421 million kilometers or 262 million miles) from Earth, or 1070 times as far as the moon and 2.79 times as far as the sun. Radio signals, traveling at the universal limit of the speed of light, take 47 minutes to make the round trip. Dr. Marc D. Rayman 9:30 p.m. PDT August 30, 2010 Sep. 1, 2010 | 19:41 PDT | Sep. 2 02:41 UTC Help explorers from Earth travel to new places in our Solar Systemby Bill Nye It can't be easy to bring Nobel Prize laureates and high government officials together over the same issue. But two Planetary Society board members, Scott Hubbard and John Logsdon, have done it – and produced a letter to Rep. Bart Gordon, chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Science Committee, expressing concern about that committee's proposed budget for NASA that is signed by 14 Nobel winners and 14 former NASA officials. As the incoming Executive Director of the Planetary Society, they asked me to sign it along with them. Once again, I find myself in remarkable company. These are some distinguished and thoughtful space people. With Scott and John's lead, we quickly came together in support of NASA programs that we feel are critical to advancing exploration of worlds, both robotic and human. If the House bill is passed as is, four program areas are of particular concern. Technology Development -- The technology we have right now to reach and explore space is too expensive. To make space exploration affordable, NASA must lead the way, nurturing new technology and invention. Right now, the House bill essentially eliminates the Exploration Technology Program. That's a mistake that our representatives have to correct. NASA must be given the money to create the future in space. Commercial Spaceflight -- If NASA is to reach beyond the Moon and someday reach Mars, it must be relieved of the burden of launching people and cargo to low earth orbit. To do that, we must invest more in commercial spaceflight. The proposed House-Senate authorization bill would spend $900 million on buying seats on Soyuz rockets, while giving $450 million to develop commercial crew launchers and $14 million for cargo rockets. These funds need to be reallocated. Robotic Precursors -- Since the days of Apollo, NASA has sent robot spacecraft to scout another world before sending humans there to explore. The Robotic Precursor program was cancelled after one mission (Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter) so the money could be diverted to the Constellation program. If we're serious about advancing exploration of our Solar System and sending humans to other worlds, that money must be restored. University and Student Research -- One of NASA's big responsibilities is to inspire. Part of the agency's mission is to excite students and boost them into careers in science, technology, engineering, and math. NASA's university education funding comes from its science and technology budgets. With the technology budget cut, there's not enough money for these educational programs. That budget line needs to be increased. Since the Administration released its NASA budget for fiscal year 2011, the leadership of the Planetary Society has been working to make sure NASA gets its increased funding and sets a new direction for human spaceflight. I signed this letter as Executive Director Designate of the Planetary Society. I'm going to keep working to help explorers from Earth travel to new places in our Solar System. Join me. Bill Nye (And if you want to read the full text of the letter, and see everyone who signed it, you can find it here.) Sep. 1, 2010 | 16:40 PDT | 23:40 UTC Possibly the best view of the Great Red Spot everIcelandic amateur image processor Björn Jónsson just posted this to unmannedspaceflight.com and I thought it was so spectacular that I had to post it -- and his explanation -- here directly. It never ceases to amaze me what can be pulled out of this 30-year-old data. --ESL by Björn Jónsson This is a new, big mosaic of Voyager 1 images, this time showing the Great Red Spot at high resolution. The contrast and sharpness have been greatly exaggerated. [Visit unmannedspaceflight.com for a version without this exaggeration.]
The images I used were obtained on March 4, 1979 at a distance of about 1.85 million kilometers. The first image (C1635314.IMQ) was obtained at 07:08:36 and the last one (C1635400.IMQ) at 07:45:24. The resolution is roughly 18 km/pixel. Mosaics of some of these images have appeared before as 'official' image releases but interestingly, only three-by-two-frame mosaics were used in all cases. The official mosaic can be seen here. There is a false color version (lots of blue color) that is better known. My new mosaic reveals an enormous amount of details, especially in the sharpened version. Some of these details I didn't know were visible in any images of Jupiter until relatively recently. The sunlight is coming from the east (right) and because the Great Red Spot is in the southern hemisphere it's really coming roughly from the east-northeast over the Great Red Spot and the regions south of it. With this in mind, vertical relief and cloud shadows are -- I think -- visible at many locations around the Red Spot's periphery. I have marked them on the key below.
Interestingly, the orange and violet images I used here were followed by a green-filtered Great Red Spot mosaic about 40 minutes later. However, I couldn't use these and was forced to create a synthetic green channel from orange and violet channels because some of the clouds (especially in the northeast periphery) moved so fast that the three color channels couldn't be properly aligned if I used the green images. Browse the Weblog Archive » We
need your help. |
|||||||||||||
 |
 |
|||||||||||||
Copyright © 1993 – 2010 The Planetary Society. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Society Updates
[ what is this? ]
[ what is this? ]